Home

Biblio

Export 15 results:
Sort by: Author [ Keyword (Asc)] Title Type Year
Filters: First Letter Of Keyword is R  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q [R] S T U V W X Y Z   [Show ALL]
randomization
Curtsinger, C, Berger ED.  2013.  STABILIZER: Statistically Sound Performance Evaluation. Proceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems. :219–228. Abstract
relevance
Atmanspacher, H, Lambert BL, Folkers G, Schubiger PA.  2014.  Relevance relations for the concept of reproducibility. J. R. Soc. Interface. 11(94) Abstract
repeatability
Delling, D, Demetrescu C, Johnson DS, Vitek J.  2016.  Rethinking Experimental Methods in Computing (Dagstuhl Seminar 16111). Dagstuhl Reports. 6:24–43. Abstract
Vitek, J, Kalibera T.  2011.  Repeatability, reproducibility, and rigor in systems research. Proceedings of the ninth ACM international conference on Embedded software. :33–38. Abstract
replay compilation
Georges, A, Eeckhout L, Buytaert D.  2008.  Java performance evaluation through rigorous replay compilation. Proceedings of the 23rd ACM SIGPLAN conference on Object-oriented programming systems languages and applications. :367–384. Abstract
Replicability
Lehrer, J.  2010.  The Truth Wears Off: Is there something wrong with the scientific method? The New Yorker. (December 13, 2010):52. Abstract
Reproducibility
Vitek, J, Kalibera T.  2011.  Repeatability, reproducibility, and rigor in systems research. Proceedings of the ninth ACM international conference on Embedded software. :33–38. Abstract
Mudge, T.  1996.  Report on the panel: "how can computer architecture researchers avoid becoming the society for irreproducible results?" SIGARCH Comput. Archit. News. 24:1–5.
Drummond, C.  2009.  Replicability in not Reproducibility: Nor is it Good Science. The 4th workshop on Evaluation Methods for Machine Learning. Abstract
Delling, D, Demetrescu C, Johnson DS, Vitek J.  2016.  Rethinking Experimental Methods in Computing (Dagstuhl Seminar 16111). Dagstuhl Reports. 6:24–43. Abstract
Feitelson, DG.  2006.  Experimental Computer Science: The Need for a Cultural Change. Abstract
Atmanspacher, H, Lambert BL, Folkers G, Schubiger PA.  2014.  Relevance relations for the concept of reproducibility. J. R. Soc. Interface. 11(94) Abstract
research culture
Prechelt, L.  1997.  Why We Need an Explicit Forum for Negative Results. Journal of Universal Computer Science. 3:1074–1083. Abstract
research guidelines
Kitchenham, BA, Pfleeger S L, Pickard LM, Jones PW, Hoaglin DC, Emam K E, Rosenberg J.  2002.  Preliminary guidelines for empirical research in software engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng.. 28:721–734. Abstract
Research Management
Liskov, B.  1992.  Report on Workshop on Research in Experimental Computer Science. :49. Abstract
Research methodology
Ko, AJ, Latoza TD, Burnett MM.  2015.  A Practical Guide to Controlled Experiments of Software Engineering Tools with Human Participants. Empirical Softw. Engg.. 20:110–141. Abstract
Wieringa, R, Heerkens H, Regnell B.  2009.  How to Write and Read a Scientific Evaluation Paper. Proceedings of the 2009 17th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE. :361–364. Abstract
research methods
Hanenberg, S.  2010.  Faith, hope, and love: an essay on software science's neglect of human factors. Proceedings of the ACM international conference on Object oriented programming systems languages and applications. :933–946. Abstract
Research reporting
Wieringa, R, Heerkens H, Regnell B.  2009.  How to Write and Read a Scientific Evaluation Paper. Proceedings of the 2009 17th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, RE. :361–364. Abstract