<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>12</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Judy Robertson</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Stats: We're Doing It Wrong</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">BLOG@CACM</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://cacm.acm.org/blogs/blog-cacm/107125-stats-were-doing-it-wrong/fulltext</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ACM</style></publisher><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">It's quite common for HCI or computer science education researchers to use attitude questionnaires to examine people's opinions of new software or teaching interventions. These are often on a likert-type scale of strongly agree to strongly disagree. And the sad truth is that researchers typically use the wrong statistical techniques to analyse them. </style></abstract></record></records></xml>