<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="6.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Fleming, Philip J.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Wallace, John J.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">How Not to Lie with Statistics: The Correct Way to Summarize Benchmark Results</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Commun. ACM</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1986</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/5666.5673</style></url></web-urls></urls><number><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></number><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ACM</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">New York, NY, USA</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">29</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">218–221</style></pages><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Using the arithmetic mean to summarize normalized benchmark results leads to mistaken conclusions that can be avoided by using the preferred method: the geometric mean.</style></abstract></record></records></xml>