Experimental Evaluation of Software and Systems in Computer ScienceExperimental Evaluation of Software and Systems in Computer Science

Search

Navigation

  • Artifact Evaluation
  • Letter to PC Chairs
  • Anti-Patterns
  • Technical Reports
  • Evaluate 2012
  • Issues
  • Biblio
    • The Canon
    • Authors
    • Keywords
  • Venues
  • Resources

Follow @EvaluateWell

User login

  • Request new password
Home

Biblio

  • List
  • Filter
Export 5 results:
  • RTF
  • Tagged
  • XML
  • BibTex
Sort by: Author Keyword [ Title (Asc)] Type Year
Filters: First Letter Of Title is W  [Clear All Filters]
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V [W] X Y Z   [Show ALL]
W
Blackburn, SM, McKinley KS, Garner R, Hoffmann C, Khan AM, Bentzur R, Diwan A, Feinberg D, Frampton D, Guyer SZ et al..  2008.  Wake Up and Smell the Coffee: Evaluation Methodology for the 21st Century. Commun. ACM. 51:83–89.
  • RTF
  • Tagged
  • XML
  • BibTex
  • Google Scholar
Norvig, P.  2012.  Warning Signs in Experimental Design and Interpretation. 2012 Abstract
  • RTF
  • Tagged
  • XML
  • BibTex
  • Google Scholar
Ioannidis, JPA.  2005.  Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. PLoS Medicine. 2:e124. Abstract
  • RTF
  • Tagged
  • XML
  • BibTex
  • Google Scholar
Prechelt, L.  1997.  Why We Need an Explicit Forum for Negative Results. Journal of Universal Computer Science. 3:1074–1083. Abstract
  • RTF
  • Tagged
  • XML
  • BibTex
  • Google Scholar
Oreskes, N.  2014.  Why we should trust scientists. Abstract
  • RTF
  • Tagged
  • XML
  • BibTex
  • Google Scholar
""

The Canon

Let's build an "Experimental Evaluation in Software and Systems Canon", a list of readings on experimental evaluation and "good science" that have influenced us and that have the potential to influence the researchers coming after us.

Go to the Canon.

Letter to PC Chairs

Are you working on a call for papers for a systems or software venue?

Please read our open letter to PC chairs.